HaloPSA vs Avanan (Check Point Harmony)
Crowdsourced pricing, contract minimums, API sync depth and verified MSP sentiment for both products — no vendor marketing copy.
Quote range $95.00–$105.00 · 3 data points
Quote range $2.10–$2.10 · 2 data points
Quick verdict
HaloPSA wins on aggregate MSP sentiment, API grade and tenancy depth — but Avanan (Check Point Harmony) is cheaper per unit in list pricing.
Pricing comparison matrix
| Pricing model | per tech / mo | per mailbox / mo |
|---|---|---|
| List price / unit | $105.00 | $2.10 |
| Reported quote range | $95.00 – $105.00 | $2.10 – $2.10 |
| Reported seat minimum | 1 units | None |
| Contract term | 1 year | 1 year |
| API grade / tenancy | API A · tenancy 5/5 | API B · tenancy 4/5 |
| Contract gotchas |
|
|
Native API integration grid
What actually flows between HaloPSA and Avanan (Check Point Harmony) today. Email-parsed alerting; no tenant sync
- Bidirectional ticket / alert sync
One-way alert push only — closing the ticket does not clear the alert.
- Asset / device mapping
Devices match to client records automatically after the initial mapping pass.
- Alert escalation rules
Escalation logic has to live in one system; expect duplicated rule sets.
- Billing reconciliation
Neither product owns billing — reconcile through your billing/PSA layer.
- Webhook / event support
Both sides expose event webhooks (API grades A and B).
HaloPSA: pros & cons
- Workflow engine
- Great API
- Responsive roadmap
- Steep initial configuration
- Docs lag behind features
Verified 1,500 Endpoints • 5 Techs“Migrated off ConnectWise in six weeks. Contract billing finally matches what we actually deliver.”
Co-Managed MSP Owner • 7 Techs“Every integration we needed either existed or was a two-hour webhook build.”
Avanan (Check Point Harmony): pros & cons
- No MX change
- Strong phishing catch rate
- Post-delivery clawback
- Console complexity
- Highest price in class
Verified 2,000 Endpoints • 8 Techs“Catch rate is excellent. Onboarding a tenant takes about four minutes.”