Autotask PSA vs Avanan (Check Point Harmony)
Crowdsourced pricing, contract minimums, API sync depth and verified MSP sentiment for both products — no vendor marketing copy.
Quote range $95.00–$95.00 · 2 data points
Quote range $2.10–$2.10 · 2 data points
Quick verdict
Avanan (Check Point Harmony) wins on aggregate MSP sentiment, API grade and tenancy depth — but Autotask PSA is cheaper per unit in some quoted tiers.
Pricing comparison matrix
| Pricing model | per tech / mo | per mailbox / mo |
|---|---|---|
| List price / unit | $95.00 | $2.10 |
| Reported quote range | $95.00 – $95.00 | $2.10 – $2.10 |
| Reported seat minimum | 1 units | None |
| Contract term | 1–3 year lock | 1 year |
| API grade / tenancy | API B · tenancy 4/5 | API B · tenancy 4/5 |
| Contract gotchas |
|
|
Native API integration grid
What actually flows between Autotask PSA and Avanan (Check Point Harmony) today. Alert email parsing only
- Bidirectional ticket / alert sync
One-way alert push only — closing the ticket does not clear the alert.
- Asset / device mapping
Devices match to client records automatically after the initial mapping pass.
- Alert escalation rules
Escalation logic has to live in one system; expect duplicated rule sets.
- Billing reconciliation
Neither product owns billing — reconcile through your billing/PSA layer.
- Webhook / event support
Both sides expose event webhooks (API grades B and B).
Autotask PSA: pros & cons
- Snappy UI
- Native Datto RMM sync
- Good default reports
- Less flexible workflows
- Contract terms
Verified 2,000 Endpoints • 8 Techs“Solid daily driver. Procurement and renewals are where the pain lives.”
Avanan (Check Point Harmony): pros & cons
- No MX change
- Strong phishing catch rate
- Post-delivery clawback
- Console complexity
- Highest price in class
Verified 2,000 Endpoints • 8 Techs“Catch rate is excellent. Onboarding a tenant takes about four minutes.”