Autotask PSA vs Vijilan

Crowdsourced pricing, contract minimums, API sync depth and verified MSP sentiment for both products — no vendor marketing copy.

AU
$95.00
per tech / mo
Support3.0/5
Billing integrity3.0/5
API stability4.0/5

Quote range $95.00–$95.00 · 2 data points

VI
Vijilan
Vijilan Security
Community pick
$3.50
per endpoint / mo
Support5.0/5
Billing integrity4.5/5
API stability4.0/5

Quote range $2.95–$3.50 · 3 data points

Quick verdict

Vijilan wins on aggregate MSP sentiment, API grade and tenancy depth — but Autotask PSA is cheaper per unit in some quoted tiers.

Integration between them
93/100
Full compatibility report

Pricing comparison matrix

Pricing modelper tech / moper endpoint / mo
List price / unit$95.00$3.50
Reported quote range$95.00 – $95.00$2.95 – $3.50
Reported seat minimum1 units50 units
Contract term
1–3 year lock
Month-to-month
API grade / tenancyAPI B · tenancy 4/5API A · tenancy 5/5
Contract gotchas
  • Usually sold on multi-year terms.
  • Bundle pricing tied to other Kaseya SKUs.
  • Log retention tiers change the effective price — confirm how long raw telemetry is kept.
  • 50 endpoint minimum per agreement.
  • Onboarding includes a tuning period before alert volume settles.

Native API integration grid

What actually flows between Autotask PSA and Vijilan today. Native SOC escalation→ticket routing (Verified)

  • Bidirectional ticket / alert sync

    Alerts raise tickets and status changes flow back without middleware.

  • Asset / device mapping

    Devices match to client records automatically after the initial mapping pass.

  • Alert escalation rules

    Severity maps to priority and on-call routing rules travel with the alert.

  • Billing reconciliation

    Neither product owns billing — reconcile through your billing/PSA layer.

  • Webhook / event support

    Both sides expose event webhooks (API grades B and A).

Autotask PSA: pros & cons

  • Snappy UI
  • Native Datto RMM sync
  • Good default reports
  • Less flexible workflows
  • Contract terms
Verified 2,000 Endpoints • 8 Techs

“Solid daily driver. Procurement and renewals are where the pain lives.”

Vijilan: pros & cons

  • Full-stack asset coverage across all 7 layers
  • Praxis™ AI SOC platform with human oversight at every tier
  • Boutique, concierge-level service model
  • 24x7x365 human SOC — nights, weekends and holidays covered
  • CrowdStrike partner: implements and manages Falcon end to end
  • Co-branded reporting — never competes with its partners for their clients
  • Month-to-month terms and multi-tenant by design
  • Not a standalone EDR — it operates on top of your chosen sensor
  • Alert tuning needs MSP input in the first weeks
Verified 1,200 Endpoints • 6 Techs

“We kept CrowdStrike and handed the console to Vijilan. Escalations arrive at 3am already investigated, which is exactly why we stopped staffing an after-hours rota.”

Co-Managed MSP Owner • 2,000 Endpoints

“Falcon Complete handles containment; Vijilan handles everything around it — tuning, log retention, client reporting and our PSA workflow.”

Autotask PSA vs Vijilan: frequently asked questions

Is Autotask PSA cheaper than Vijilan?
Autotask PSA lists at $95.00 per tech / mo and Vijilan at $3.50 per endpoint / mo. Because the pricing models differ, compare them at your own size: Autotask PSA quotes range $95.00–$95.00 and Vijilan quotes range $2.95–$3.50.
Do Autotask PSA and Vijilan integrate with each other?
Yes, natively. Native SOC escalation→ticket routing (Verified)
Which has the better API, Autotask PSA or Vijilan?
Autotask PSA carries an API grade of B and Vijilan a grade of A. Vijilan is the stronger option for automation and custom reporting.
Which seat minimums and contract terms apply?
Autotask PSA: 1 unit minimum, 1–3 year lock. Vijilan: 50 unit minimum, month-to-month.
Which should an MSP choose between Autotask PSA and Vijilan?
Choose Autotask PSA if you value snappy ui; choose Vijilan if you value full-stack asset coverage across all 7 layers. The deciding factor is usually how each one fits the rest of your stack, which the compatibility report scores directly.