Cisco Umbrella vs Rewst
Crowdsourced pricing, contract minimums, API sync depth and verified MSP sentiment for both products — no vendor marketing copy.
Quote range $2.40–$2.40 · 2 data points
Quote range $350.00–$350.00 · 2 data points
Quick verdict
Rewst wins on aggregate MSP sentiment, API grade and tenancy depth — but Cisco Umbrella is cheaper per unit in list pricing.
Pricing comparison matrix
| Pricing model | per endpoint / mo | flat / mo |
|---|---|---|
| List price / unit | $2.40 | $350.00 |
| Reported quote range | $2.40 – $2.40 | $350.00 – $350.00 |
| Reported seat minimum | 100 units | None |
| Contract term | 1 year | 1 year |
| API grade / tenancy | API B · tenancy 3/5 | API A · tenancy 5/5 |
| Contract gotchas |
|
|
Native API integration grid
What actually flows between Cisco Umbrella and Rewst today. Generic HTTP actions only
- Bidirectional ticket / alert sync
One-way alert push only — closing the ticket does not clear the alert.
- Asset / device mapping
Devices match to client records automatically after the initial mapping pass.
- Alert escalation rules
Escalation logic has to live in one system; expect duplicated rule sets.
- Billing reconciliation
Counts must be exported and matched by hand each month.
- Webhook / event support
Both sides expose event webhooks (API grades B and A).
Cisco Umbrella: pros & cons
- Enterprise credibility
- SWG upgrade path
- Global infrastructure
- Seat minimums
- MSP tenancy friction
- Higher price
Verified 4,100 Endpoints • 16 Techs“We keep it for the enterprise clients who ask for Cisco by name.”
Rewst: pros & cons
- Prebuilt Crates
- Connects everything
- Huge time savings
- Needs internal champion
- Annual term
- Learning curve
Verified 2,800 Endpoints • 9 Techs“Automated onboarding/offboarding across PSA, M365 and Huntress. Saved a full FTE of effort.”